Medicare Secondary Payer CLE at the NCBA Workers’ Compensation Annual Meeting

Screen Shot 2016-02-03 at 12.10.45 PM

For years, there has been debate on the subject of Medicare Set-Asides (MSAs). Are they required or not? How do you calculate them? When do you have to ask the federal government to review and approve them? While MSAs are one option to help parties comply with the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) Act, they are not the only option. Rather than asking “Is an MSA required?” the settlement community would be wise to focus on what the statutory obligation actually is and always has been.

While the Medicare Secondary Payer provisions never mention the term “Medicare Set-Aside” or “MSA” in the statute or regulations, it does prohibit Medicare from paying for future items and services where a primary plan or payer has accepted responsibility for those same items or services. Thus, the critical issue becomes identifying whether the settlement award contains proceeds that compensate the claimant for some or all of those future injury-related items or services. If it does, then the claimant should make sure Medicare is not billed until that compensated amount is spent down appropriately. While an MSA could be one tool to ensure that occurs, it’s not the only way. In fact, the growing trend is for parties resolving workers’ compensation claims to develop and implement a non-submit MSA program with a partner whose conclusions and assurances serve to substitute in full for the federal government’s approval of your MSA figure.

John Cattie, our MSP Compliance Subject Matter Expert, will be speaking to the Workers’ Compensation section of the North Carolina Bar Association on Thursday, February 4th at 10:15AM at the Grandover Resort in Greensboro, NC about these future medicals issues. Attendees will walk away with a clear understanding of the future medicals obligation under the MSP statute and regulations as well as why a non-submit MSA program may make a lot of sense for those parties wishing to avoid the time and expense of seeking approval from the federal government. We hope you can join him. 

Click here for more information about the NCBA Workers’ Compensation Annual Meeting.

California Medicaid Lien Update

Recently, the California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) officially changed its reimbursement procedures for California Medicaid (“Medi-Cal”) beneficiaries. Going forward, DHCS will no longer provide non-final lien amounts.  This means that no payment data or claims will be available to you until DHCS receives the last date of treatment, or the date of settlement…

Updates to the MSPRP Modification for Inclusion of Final Conditional Payment Process Functionality

January 1, 2016 is right around the corner and CMS is making final enhancements to its conditional payment web portal to comply with the SMART Act. You can read more about the SMART Act here. You may have received the update below from CMS about conditional payment reimbursement. With the enhancements to the web portal almost complete,…

Benson v. Sebelius: Judicial Justification for Allocating Proceeds Between Medicals and Non-Medicals

Executive Summary: There has been ample discussion recently about how to identify and satisfy future medical reimbursement obligations associated with the resolution of a claim asserted by a Medicare beneficiary. Historically, parties may have taken a conservative approach by merely reviewing medical records and valuing those reimbursement obligations at whatever value was attached to the…

Injury Board Day of Action – How GRG is supporting children and families in our community

When it comes to healing, something as simple as a home cooked meal or spending time with family can make all the difference. To do our part to help improve the health and well-being of children and families, GRG is working with the local Ronald McDonald Houses in all four of our locations to provide support…