Friday FAQ: The Effect of No Fault Coverage on MSP Compliance

lien resolution expertsQuestion: I was an attendee at a recent conference where an attorney from GRG spoke. He talked about factors you should consider when deciding whether a client needs an MSA or not, and documenting the file if you decide an MSA is not required. In making that decision, does the amount of No Fault coverage a plaintiff has in a motor vehicle accident case effect whether an MSA is necessary?

I am currently handling a matter where the plaintiff has significant No Fault coverage left, as well as an additional $25K of OBEL coverage and APIP coverage. The plaintiff will require a surgery in the future, but at this point has delayed having it due to circumstances regarding the care of a spouse. The No Fault carrier has indicated that they will pay for the surgery and all subsequent follow up appointments and therapy when the plaintiff decides to have the surgery.

The underlying bodily injury limits in this case I mentioned are only $50K. The client is concerned that any net proceeds he/she may receive will be eaten up by an MSA. However, in thinking about this case I was not sure if an MSA would be necessary in light of the available No Fault coverage. Any insight that you can provide on this would be appreciated.

Answer: At the end of the day, the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) statute (42 U.S.C. §1395y(b)(2)) is all about burden shifting. By that, I mean to say that the statute is in place to ensure that the party responsible for a beneficiary’s injuries is paying those bills such that the federal government (and the American taxpayer) are not footing that bill. This means that the beneficiary takes a certain amount of settlement proceeds (affirmatively identified as opposed to proceeds intended for past medicals, wage loss, non-economic damages, etc) and uses those first before Medicare gets billed. Under that rubric, a beneficiary does not rule afoul of the MSP statute if an entity other than Medicare is paying for future injury-related care. In your fact pattern, it sounds as though there is ample No-Fault coverage available which would pay first before Medicare is asked to pay. So long as that coverage continues to exist and is available to make those payments going forward, Medicare would not be asked to pay. Thus, no one would run afoul of the MSP statute with respect to future medicals.

We would be happy to formalized this guidance for the file in the form of an MSA Evaluation Letter which you could rely on to document the file and evidence compliance on this issue going forward. Let us know if we can assist!

50% Off CLE Courses for AAJ Annual Convention

Heading to the AAJ Summer Annual Convention this weekend? We’ll be there at booth #706 so be sure to come by and talk liens and medicare set asides with us! We’ll have our Subject Matter Experts there to answer any questions you may have, PLUS you’ll have a chance to win a free Kindle Fire. We’re…

How to Handle ERISA Self-Insured Plans with Stop Loss Coverage and Low Attachment Points

Question: I have a situation with an ERISA self insured plan that has stop loss with very low attachment points —-operates like a 4K deductible per person. There are substantial medical bills in the case which were paid. At this point it appears those bills were not paid by the employer, but directly to the providers…

Friday FAQ: Is a Medicare Set Aside Necessary in My Case?

Question: I have a female client (DOB 10/23/1937) who sustained a minor hip fracture in March, 2009. She only treated for a few months (last treatment date was in May, 2009), and she has not received any medical treatment for that injury since May 2009. I do not believe that she was a Medicare beneficiary…

GRG at Alabama Association for Justice’s Annual Convention

Once again, Garretson Resolution Group (“Garretson”) is pleased to work with members of the Alabama Association for Justice (“ALAJ”) and speak with ALAJ members at the ALAJ annual convention about lien resolution, Medicare compliance and Medicare Set-Aside issues. This year, John Cattie, our Medicare Secondary Payer subject matter expert, will be on site to answer…